|
Design Tips | Questions & Answers | Resources
Resources
Assessment: Accessibility of computer-based assessment
The electronic format of assessment benefits students with disabilities. However, it can create accessibility barriers as well. For example, a student who uses a screen reader spends a considerably larger amount of time accessing and navigating an online quiz as compared to his/her peers. If an online quiz is not compatible with the assistive device the student is using, the student may be blocked from completing the quiz at all.
Here are some suggestions:
- Allow students to familiarize themselves with the assessment tool in advance.
- Make sure the assessment tool is compatible with the assistive devices that your students use.
- Provide additional time or support to students who may be disadvantaged due to their disability.
- Consider creating equivalent alternative forms of assessment.
Here are suggested resources for further reading.
- Abell, M., Bauder, D., & Simmons, T. (2004). Universally Designed Online Assessment: Implications for the Future.
- Allan, J., Bulla, N., & Goodman, S. (2003). TEST ACCESS: Guidelines for Computer Administered Testing. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
- Freewood, M. (2005). Accessible Assessments - Staff Guide to Inclusive Practice.
- TechDis. (n.d.). Inclusive Learning and Teaching: ILT for Disabled Learners. 2.4 Technology-Based Assessments (pdf) .
- Thompson, S.J., Johnstone, C.J., Anderson, M. E., & Miller, N. A. (2005). Considerations for the development and review of universally designed assessments (Technical Report 42). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
Assistive technology for students with learning disabilities
Students with learning disabilities make the biggest group among college students with disabilities. Accessibility efforts in online instruction have not been focused on this target group until recently. Knowing what assistive technology students with learning disabilities use in class will contribute to understanding the needs of these students in education-based information technology. Here are a few examples of assistive technology compensating for a specific learning difficulty.
- Writing: spell checker, online dictionary and thesaurus, word prediction in typing, voice input device, outlining and concept mapping software.
- Reading: e-books, screen reader (eReader, JAWS, Easy Access, Sound Proof), large-screen monitor, talking word processor, talking dictionary (defines and pronounces a word), self-voicing browser (WebSpeak, IBM Home Page Reader), and abbreviation expanders.
- Math: talking calculator (use speech synthesis to speak numbers) and electronic worksheet.
- Organization and Memory: personal data manager and organizer, notes manager, and online calendar and planner.
Find more reading below.
- Cook, R., & Gladhart, M. (2002). A survey of online instructional issues and strategies for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Wichita State University.
- Day, S. L., & Edwards, B.J. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. LDOnline.org.
- DO-IT. (n.d.). Learning Disabilities. University of Washington.
- DO-IT. (n.d.). What are specific computer applications that can assist students with learning disabilities? University of Washington.
- Stahn, S. (2005). Learning disabilities and the power of assistive technology. Universal Learning Center at the Center for Applied Special Technology.
- Wimberly, L., Reed, N., & Morris, M. (2004). Postsecondary students with learning disabilities: Barriers to accessing education-based information technology. Information Technology and Disabilities, 10, 1-2.
Audio and video on the web
To be compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, audio and video must include text equivalents for all non-text content. This is done by providing captions, transcripts, and text descriptions. Below is the list of resources where you can find more information on the topic.
Benefits of Accessible Web
Cognitive Disabilities and Web Accessibility
- Allam, C. (n.d.). Designing a dyslexia-friendly multimedia drawing package for architecture students.
- Bohman, P. (2005). Cognitive disabilities Part 1: We still know too little, and we do even less.
- Bohman, P., & Anderson, S. (2005). A conceptual framework for accessibility tools to benefit users with cognitive disabilities.
- Bradford, J. (2005). Designing web pages for dyslexic readers.
- Brown, D. J., & Lawton, J. (2001). Design guidelines and issues for web site production for use by people with a learning disability (pdf).
- Hudson, R., Weakley, R. & Firminger, P. (2005). Developing sites for users with Cognitive disabilities and learning difficulties.
- Hudson, R., Weakley, R. & Firminger, P. (2005). An Accessibility Frontier: Cognitive disabilities and learning difficulties.
- Jiwnani, K. (2001). Designing for users with cognitive disabilities.
- Kolatch, E. (2000). Designing for users with cognitive disabilities. Department of Computer Science University of Maryland.
- LDWeb. (n.d.). How to design web content for people with learning disabilities.
- Marshall, A. (n.d.). Web design for dyslexic users.
- Rainger, P. (2003). A dyslexic perspective on e-content accessibility. TechDis.
- Vassallo, S. (2003). Enabling the Internet for People with Dyslexia.
- WebAIM. (n.d.). Distractability simulation (for certain types of cognitive disabilities).
- W3C. (2004). How people with disabilities use the Web.
Evaluating Web Accessibility
Evaluating Web Accessibility with Web Browser Tools
The following browser tools help web developers manually assess the accessibility of a web page.
Flash
Educators quickly realized the power of Flash. Interactive tutorials, assessments, games, simulations are just few examples of educational products created with Macromedia Flash. However, special efforts are needed to make the Flash content universally accessible.
To ensure the accessibility of Flash products:
1) Create accessible Flash content for students who use assistive technologies that support Flash (latest versions of JAWS and Window-Eyes screen readers).
2) Provide an accessible alternative content for students who cannot use Flash.
Below are a few articles devoted to Flash accessibility.
- Kirkpatrick, A. (2002). Flash MX: Moving Toward Accessible Rich Media. A List Apart.
- Kirkpatrick, A. (2005, August). In search of... a perfect plugin technique.
- May, M. (2005, August). Validity, Accessibility, Flash: Choose two. Accessify.
- Regan, Bob. (2005, August). Best practices for accessible Flash design. Macromedia White Paper.
- Smith, J. (2004). Creating Accessible Macromedia Flash Content. WebAIM.
How Leading Computer Hardware and Software Manufacturers Address the Needs of People with Disabilities in Their Products.
Online Communication and Collaboration Learning Tools
Online learning tools including discussion boards, chats, file sharing, whiteboards, and webcasts to name a few, became essential in higher education. But do students with disabilities have an easy and equal access to these tools? Are there any barriers that prevent them from full participation in the learning process? Read below about the research and successful practices in this area.
- ACollab, an open source web-based collaborative work environment.
- Amtmann, D., Cook, D., & Johnson, K. (2003). Online learning management
systems: Accessibility of tools for synchronous communication. California State University. Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference 2003.
- Barstow, C. & Rothberg, M. (2002). Guidelines for developing accessible synchronous communication and collaboration tools. IMS Global Learning Consortium.
- Blackboard. (n.d.). Section 508 implementation.
- Durham University. (n.d.). Disabled students and asynchronous communication tools in a VLE. (PDF)
- Durham University. (n.d.). Disabled students and synchronous communication tools in a VLE. (PDF)
- Koivunen, M.R. (2004). Accessibility of web collaboration technologies. California State University. Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference 2004.
- Smith, J. (2001). Accessibility of online chat programs. WebAIM.
Online Learning Resources
Online Learning Resources - Accessibility Guidelines
People with Disabilities: How They Use the Web
PowerPoint for the Web
Accessibility in Distance Education. Microsoft PowerPoint.
Banks, R., Coombs, E., & Coombs, N. (2005). Accessible PowerPoint on the Web: Tools that can help. Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference Proceedings.
Cummins, J.C. (2004). Designing accessible PowerPoint presentations and PDF files for the Web. The University of Tennessee.
IBM Accessibility Center. (2005). Creating accessible Microsoft PowerPoint documents.
National Center on Disability and Access to Education. (2005). NCDAE Tips and Tools: Microsoft PowerPoint. Utah State University.
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired. (2005). How to Make an Accessible Web-based PowerPoint Presentation.
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign. Illinois Accessible Web Publishing Wizard: Accessibility Wizard Manual.
WebAIM. (n.d). PowerPoint accessibility techniques.
University Web Accessibility Policies
US Laws and Web Accessibility
Using a Style Sheet to Format a Web Page for Printing
Web Accessibility Guidelines and Checklists
Web Design Guidelines
Web Forms Forms
Word Accessibility
Microsoft Word documents are generally compatible with assistive technology. However, an incorrectly formatted or structured Word document can create difficulties for students with disabilities. For example, a blind student who uses a screen reader has difficulty scanning a Word document if its headings are not formatted with true Word styles. A color-blind student may fail to differentiate the text highlighted with the low-contrast color. In addition, incorrectly formatted documents hamper the accessibility of the Word files exported to PDF and HTML.
The online resources below explain further the accessibility techniques for Word.
Writing for the Web
- Burne, J. (2004). Accessible web typography [electronic version].
- Lynch, P., & Horton, S. (2002). Editorial Style.
- Moss, T. (2005). Website content and usability.
- Morkes, J., & and Nielsen, J. (1997). Concise, SCANNABLE, and objective: How to write for the Web.
- Nielsen, J., Schemenaur, P.J., & Fox, J. (n.d.). Writing for the Web.
- Skills for Access. (n.d.). Maximize text readability - general advice.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Research-based web guidelines: Writing web content (pdf).
|
|